U.S. Supreme Court upholds arbitration clauses in employment contracts

A new decision out of the high court is seen as pro-employer.

In a recently posted article, we talked about arbitration clauses in employment contracts that require, as a condition of employment, that employees waive their rights to file lawsuits and government agency claims of sexual harassment and potentially other kinds of legal claims. Instead, the employment contract provides that such complaints will be resolved through arbitration and remain confidential.

Arbitration is a private dispute-resolution method in which a neutral third party, called an arbitrator, acts like a private judge who hears both parties’ arguments, weighs evidence and issues a (usually) binding decision.

Impact of #MeToo

These clauses have been roundly criticized in light of recent revelations of the extent of the problem of sexual harassment in the workplace because employees are prevented from speaking out about their victimization and from seeking redress in court.

As we said in our previous article, all 50 state attorneys general have collectively asked Congress to pass a law forbidding arbitration clauses for sexual harassment allegations and, in California, a bill is pending in the legislature that would do the same for sexual harassment complaints under state law.

U.S. Supreme Court favors employers

Since that article, the U.S. Supreme Court issued on May 21 an opinion in Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis that upholds arbitration clauses under the Federal Arbitration Act or FAA, saying that a later-passed provision in the National Labor Relations Act or NLRA guaranteeing that employees may band together for “mutual aid and protection” does not negate these arbitration clauses. The court said that the mutual aid envisioned in the NLRA does not include the right to bring class actions or other jointly filed lawsuits against employers.

This decision is seen widely as pro-employer. SCOTUSBLOG reports, for example, that “it could significantly reduce the number of claims” against employers. The court opinion says that if Congress disagrees, it can pass legislation to change the result.

Significantly, Justice Ruth Ginsburg wrote a scathing dissent, which she read in court, a rare action that emphasizes her fierce opposition to the holding.

California legislation

In an update to the California legislation (AB-3080) that would forbid such clauses for sexual harassment claims based on state law, after the decision in Epic Systems, the state bill passed the Assembly on May 30 and it was introduced to the state Senate the next day. As of the time of this writing on June 16, it has been referred to two Senate committees for consideration.

In the meantime, anyone experiencing sexual harassment at work, whether through direct verbal or physical aggression or in a sexually laced hostile work environment, should speak immediately with a lawyer about what legal remedies are available, regardless of whether there is an arbitration clause in place or not. This area of law may change quickly and a knowledgeable attorney should be consulted,

It is also a good idea to talk to an attorney before signing an employment contract that contains an arbitration clause.

24/7 availability

Contact us for a
Free Case Review


Chico's FAS Inc., a Florida women's clothing chain, has become the latest retailer sued in San Francisco for

San Francisco's Gap Inc. will give thousands of California store workers nearly $1.8 million worth of clothing vouchers as compensation.

Law360, New York (August 29, 2012, 2:46 PM ET) -- A California federal judge on Tuesday signed off on a $4 million settlement


How can your employer accommodate you during your pregnancy?

You have the right to have children and a career in California. The government makes sure that employers do not treat you differently if you are pregnant. According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act gives you certain...

Your rights in a sexual harassment case

Sexual harassment is in the news every day. Unfortunately for many workers in the San Francisco area, it is something they face on the job. The law protects you. You do not have to tolerate behavior that makes you feel uncomfortable or threatened. Your employer must...

Handling age discrimination in the tech industry

Can you have an age discrimination case if you are not yet a senior citizen? While you may not consider yourself to be on the older side of the workforce, federal employee protection against age discrimination starts at age 40. Studies show that this problem is...

Whistleblowers may be entitled to large monetary awards

Bay Area employees may have found themselves in a situation in the workplace that warrants speaking out about problems. Sometimes called whistleblowers, employees who point out flaws in a company's policies or procedures may be subject to unfair treatment. Recently, a...

Does your employer’s dress code policy discriminate against you?

When you think about discrimination in the workplace, you probably think about denial of a promotion, a good assignment or a better schedule based on your race, religion, gender or some other protected factor. However, there are hidden sources of discrimination that...

CELA - California Employment Lawyers Association
The Bar Association of San Francisco - BASF Member 2013
American Association for Justice
NELA National Employment Lawyers Association
TLPJ Trial Lawyers for Public Justice
The American Trial Lawyers Association